Re: Proposal for MTOM section 4 conformance in MTOM policy assertion doc

Anish,

Looks good, just a couple of minor editorial tweaks. Other than that, I 
would think that this is an effective
resolution. Do others agree?

When the binding used for a service is SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding 
[http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part2-20070427/#soapinhttp], and 
the MTOM policy assertion is in scope, that binding MUST conform to 
section 4 of the SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism [MTOM] 
specification.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 234 2986



Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> 
Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
11/21/2007 03:57 PM

To
"Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
cc

Subject
Proposal for MTOM section 4 conformance in MTOM policy assertion  doc







Resending with an appropriate subject.
-Anish
--

Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> 
> I took an AI to send a proposal to amend section 3.3 of MTOM policy 
> assertion [1] document to talk about what is the expected behavior when 
> SOAP/HTTP binding is used, i.e., whether or not section 4 of MTOM is 
> engaged. Below is the proposal:
> 
> Add the following at the end of section 3.3:
> ----------
> When the binding used for a service is SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding 
> [http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part2-20070427/#soapinhttp], and 
> the MTOM policy assertion is in scope that binding MUST conform to 
> section 4 of SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism [MTOM] 
> specification.
> ----------
> 
> Comments?
> 
> -Anish
> -- 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-soap12-mtom-policy-20070918/
>