- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:30:27 -0400
- To: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 21:30:41 UTC
Attached is a revised version of the one-way MEP, per today's conference. I'll work with Yves to get it checked in tomorrow. The inevitable notes: * The is /not//is NOT issue went away since we replaced the entire paragraph it was in. * We now say "If the sender has a means of detecting successful or unsuccessful transmission, it SHOULD fault in a binding specific manner in the event that transmission failure is detected." in paragraph 2 of 2.2, and "Each node MAY independently signal a fault in the case of abnormal operation." in the last paragraph. Presumably the sending node is included in that. So MAY it or SHOULD it? Or should we just ax the sentence in paragraph 2?
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 21:30:41 UTC