xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2006 by date

Tuesday, 31 January 2006

• Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft) Yves Lafon
• Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget David Hull
• Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft) Christopher B Ferris
• Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Christopher B Ferris
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Marc Hadley
• Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft) Yves Lafon
• Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft) Christopher B Ferris
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Christopher B Ferris
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Christopher B Ferris
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Christopher B Ferris
• Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget Jean-Jacques Moreau

Monday, 30 January 2006

• RE: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep David Hull
• Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft David Hull
• RE: Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep David Orchard
• RE: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft David Orchard
• RE: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget David Orchard
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft) Yves Lafon

Friday, 27 January 2006

• Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget Rich Salz
• Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget David Hull
• Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget Rich Salz
• Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget David Hull
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Rich Salz
• RE: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 26 January 2006

• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget David Orchard
• RE: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget David Orchard
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget David Orchard
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget David Orchard

Wednesday, 25 January 2006

• Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget David Hull
• Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 24 January 2006

• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Patrick R. McManus
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Mark Baker
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Rich Salz
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Mark Baker
• Supporting WSA with SOAP features and properties David Hull
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget David Hull
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Rich Salz
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Rich Salz
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Mark Baker
• RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP? David Orchard
• RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP? Jacek Kopecky

Monday, 23 January 2006

• RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP? David Orchard
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget David Orchard
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Rich Salz

Friday, 20 January 2006

• Re: Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep Pete Wenzel
• Re: Small update to XMLP page.. Yves Lafon
• Small update to XMLP page.. David Orchard
• RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 19 January 2006

• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... Mark Baker
• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... Mark Baker
• RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP? michael.mahan@nokia.com
• Re: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Request-response and addressing David Hull
• Action Item: new XOP issue handling Hervé Ruellan
• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 18 January 2006

• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... Mark Baker
• Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Request-response and addressing noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... Rich Salz
• Re: SOAP/XMPP Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• URI for the concept of SOAP MEP? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Request-response and addressing Mark Baker
• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... Christopher B Ferris
• FW: Updated Simple MEPs Part 2. (fwd) Yves Lafon
• Request-response and addressing David Hull

Monday, 16 January 2006

• Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep David Orchard
• Updated Simplified req-resp MEP without soap-response David Orchard
• Probable regrets for 18 January David Hull

Saturday, 14 January 2006

• Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view Mark Baker

Friday, 13 January 2006

• RE: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view David Orchard
• Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view Jan Algermissen
• RE: Preliminary work on making envelope optional David Orchard
• Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Yves Lafon
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification) John Kemp
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Mark Baker
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Mark Baker
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Marc Hadley
• Re: Preliminary work on making envelope optional noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification) Mark Baker
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Mark Baker
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification) John Kemp
• RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget David Orchard

Thursday, 12 January 2006

• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Rich Salz
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification) Mark Baker
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire Christopher B Ferris
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Mark Baker
• FYI: WSDL 2.0 CR - Call for Implementations Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... Rich Salz
• [ANN] [Axis2] Axis2 0.94 Released Eran Chinthaka
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire David Hull
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget David Hull
• Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ... David Hull
• Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget Rich Salz
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire David Hull
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire Christopher B Ferris
• Re: Preliminary work on making envelope optional Christopher B Ferris

Wednesday, 11 January 2006

• The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification) David Hull
• Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view Mark Baker
• Re: Preliminary work on making envelope optional Mark Baker
• Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view Mark Baker
• Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts David Orchard
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification) Mark Baker
• Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view Mark Baker
• Re: Preliminary work on making envelope optional noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 10 January 2006

• Re: SOAP/XMPP noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: SOAP/XMPP Rich Salz
• Re: SOAP/XMPP David Hull
• Re: SOAP/XMPP Rich Salz
• SOAP/XMPP David Hull
• Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts Rich Salz
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification) David Hull
• Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts David Hull
• Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts Rich Salz
• Re: Thought of the day: David Hull
• Re: Thought of the day: Mark Baker
• Re: The role of transfer protocols Mark Baker
• Preliminary work on making envelope optional noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 9 January 2006

• RE: Response envelope optional vs. response optional David Orchard
• RE: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts David Orchard
• Re: Thought of the day: Jan Algermissen
• Thought of the day: David Hull
• Re: The role of transfer protocols David Hull
• Re: The role of transfer protocols David Hull
• Re: The role of transfer protocols Mark Baker
• Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts Yves Lafon
• Re: The role of transfer protocols Yves Lafon
• Re: The role of transfer protocols Mark Baker
• Re: The role of transfer protocols David Hull
• Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts David Hull

Saturday, 7 January 2006

• Re: The role of transfer protocols Mark Baker

Friday, 6 January 2006

• Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts Rich Salz
• Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts David Hull
• Re: The role of transfer protocols Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire David Hull
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire Mark Baker
• Re: The role of transfer protocols David Hull
• The role of transfer protocols Mark Baker

Thursday, 5 January 2006

• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire David Hull
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire David Hull
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire David Hull
• Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts Marc Hadley
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire Mark Baker
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire David Hull
• Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire Mark Baker

Wednesday, 4 January 2006

• Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts David Orchard
• Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire David Hull
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional David Hull
• Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" Hervé Ruellan
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Marc Hadley
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Mark Baker
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Anish Karmarkar

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:15:15 UTC