- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:26:47 -0700
- To: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
[inline] Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org > [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hervé Ruellan > Sent: 14 September 2005 08:19 > To: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: Proposal for solving XOP/MTOM rec issues > > > Dear all, > > I've just check the current issues against XOP, MTOM and RSHB > recs. Here > are some draft proposal for resolving them. > > 34rec > ----- > "startinfo" parameter. > > I found one occurence of "startinfo" instead of "start-info" > in XOP and > one in MTOM. > > I think that in both cases these should be changed to "start-info". +1 > > 35rec > ----- > "action" parameter examples. > > There are two examples in XOP where the "action" parameter value is a > relative URI. > > I think that in both cases the value should be changed to an absolute > URI as specified in the SOAP spec. +1 > > Comment at [1] > -------------- > Possible defect in XOP. > > The commentator thinks that the language used to describe the > conditions > for an element information item to be optimized does not > specify clearly > that such an element information item must have only character > information items in its [children]. > > I think that the language used specify that the element > information item > must only have character information items in its [children]. > However, > this could be made explicit by adding a note in XOP 3.1 and > in MTOM 2.3.1. I also believe the current language is sufficient. But I would not be averse to adding clarifying text. > > Regards, > > Hervé. > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2005Aug/0004.html > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2005 01:28:29 UTC