Re: Suggested Minor Errata for "Resource Representation SOAP Header Block" http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PR-soap12-rep-20041116/

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Simon Kissane wrote:

> My interpretation of the "Resource Representation SOAP Header Block"
> is that section 4.3.3 is non-normative, which I believe is the
> interpretation everyone would agree with. However, the first time I
> read it, I formed the impression that the "HTTP resolver"
> functionality in it was some form of optional part of the
> specification. I might suggest, that to avoid any such impression
> being formed in the minds of a less than careful reader, that the
> section be moved to an appendix and clearly marked as "NON-NORMATIVE".
> (At first, I read the wording "Extension example:"  to mean, not that
> this section is non-normative, but that this part of the specification
> is an example of the power of the extensibility mechanisms in the
> specification.)
>
> Also, I could not find a public comment email address, or editors
> email addresses, for this specification, so I am reporting it here. Is
> this the right place? I would suggest that every recommendation should
> clearly identify in its introduction how errata or other such issues
> are to be raised.

In the status section of the document:
<<<
Please report errors in this document to xmlp-comments@w3.org (archive). 
The errata list for this edition is available at 
http://www.w3.org/2005/01/soap12-rep-errata
>>>

Thanks,

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."