xml-dist-app@w3.org from December 2005 by date

Tuesday, 27 December 2005

Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" Rich Salz

Saturday, 24 December 2005

Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" Francisco Curbera

Friday, 23 December 2005

Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" Rich Salz

Thursday, 22 December 2005

Re: Jabber Binding Supports Request/Response - existence proof of shared MEPs noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: Jabber Binding Supports Request/Response - existence proof of shared MEPs Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Binding Supports Request/Response - existence proof of shared MEPs noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Mark Baker
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 21 December 2005

Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" David Hull
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional David Hull
What it means to "get rid of MEPs" noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Mark Baker
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Anish Karmarkar
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] Anish Karmarkar
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional David Hull
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] David Hull
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Mark Baker
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: Resolution of issue Rec39 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Yves Lafon
Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] Anish Karmarkar

Tuesday, 20 December 2005

Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Anish Karmarkar
Re: Resolution of issue Rec39 Anish Karmarkar

Thursday, 15 December 2005

Re: Resolution of issue Rec39 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 14 December 2005

[Fwd: [Standards-JIG] DRAFT: JEP-0072 (SOAP Over XMPP)] Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] Mark Baker
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] David Hull
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] Mark Baker
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] David Hull
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] Mark Baker
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] David Hull
Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] Mark Baker
RE: Response envelope optional vs. response optional Glen Daniels
[Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] David Hull
Response envelope optional vs. response optional noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Resolution of issue Rec39 Anish Karmarkar

Sunday, 11 December 2005

Test collection issues michael.mahan@nokia.com

Thursday, 8 December 2005

Axis2C Milestone Release M0.2 Released Damitha Kumarage
Staff placement Karen

Wednesday, 7 December 2005

Re: Concern about status code 303 and resolution to Rec33 Mark Baker
Re: Concern about status code 303 and resolution to Rec33 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
WS-Addr requirement for XMLP and issue 39rec Anish Karmarkar
Your Account is Suspended For Security Reasons webmaster@w3.org

Friday, 2 December 2005

[ANN] [Axis2] Axis2 0.93 Released Eran Chinthaka

Thursday, 1 December 2005

EPRs, MAPs and MEPs David Hull

Last message date: Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:07:26 UTC