- From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:29:19 -0700
- To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Received on Friday, 4 June 2004 20:29:25 UTC
Ugo, Did you mean Base64Binary and not base64Decimal here? Regards, Prasad Ugo Corda wrote: >>Perhaps the right middle ground is to provide a hook that designates >>elements that are guaranteed to be in base64 canonical form, and that are >> >> >>suggested as optimization candidates? >> >> > >Could that be achieved by defining a subtype of base64Decimal that only >allows canonical representations, and associating that subtype in the >WSDL with the element we care about? > >Ugo > >
Received on Friday, 4 June 2004 20:29:25 UTC