- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:50:02 -0700
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: paul.downey@bt.com [mailto:paul.downey@bt.com] > Sent: 28 July 2004 16:54 > To: Martin Gudgin; noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: RE: Thoughts on MTOM testing > > We have a strong interest in practical interoperability given > that's the main, if not the *only* reason to use Web services. > We've seen little evidence of this happening so far, beyond > the soap builders mailing list and the odd 'fest' usually held > behind closed doors. AFAIR we did interop testing for SOAP 1.2 CR... > > We therefore encourage vendors to perform as much *real* > interoperability testing as possible, with real product line > implementations and in whatever fora, but ideally with the results > published in public. The results for SOAP 1.2 CR are at[1]. I expect we'll produce similar output for MTOM. > This especially important if you'd actually > like to sell products stamped with the "Web services" label. I'm not sure how this bears on XOP/MTOM exiting CR. > > FWIW i'm trying to put together some test cases for the WSD > test pack and will try to incorporate as many tests as the XMLP WG > elect to provide combined with WSDL 2.0 descriptions. That's cool. If I can help with that, let me know. Gudge
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2004 12:50:44 UTC