Re: Requirements for attachments^H^H^H transport optimisation

A better place for this discussion might be the XML Binary 
Characterisation WG;
   http://www.w3.org/XML/Binary/

That's not to say that these aren't important considerations for MTOM, 
but the XBCWG was formed specifically to talk about them.

Regards,


On Jul 3, 2004, at 7:46 AM, Patrick Steer wrote:

>
>
>
>
> I think it would be useful to spend a little time identifying the 
> higher-level requirements surrounding MTOM and the like. These are the 
> ones I'm aware of: 1) Reduce "bytes on the wire", to improve bandwidth 
> usage / transport latency. 2) Reduce processing overhead during the 
> generation and consumption of messages. 3)
> Enable selective reordering in the serialization of message 
> components, to allow flexibility in processing. The third deserves a 
> bit more explanation; a use case might be placing a large binary file 
> after the SOAP envelope in the serialized message, so that an 
> intermediary (or ultimate receiver, for that matter) can act upon the 
> message before reading all of the bytes off the wire.
>
> Are there any other high-level requirements associated with the 
> abstract MTOM feature? I think it would be nice to call these out in 
> the document at some point. It would also be good to note that these 
> can all be seen as encoding issues and nothing more.
> http://xml.project-web.org
> http://ebooks.die-werbung.de
> http://project-web.org
>
>

--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems

Received on Monday, 5 July 2004 15:42:30 UTC