RE: Propsed new issue: variability of encoding in Miffy from Martin Gudgin on 2004-01-14 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2004)

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:23:39 -0800
To: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B6338DADF2A@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis
> Sent: 14 January 2004 09:34
> To: Anish Karmarkar
> Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Propsed new issue: variability of encoding in Miffy
> 
<SNIP/>
> > If processors are indeed allowed to pad lines with extra 
> spaces, then 
> > I would have to agree with Noah that we must not allow 
> 7-bit and 8-bit 
> > value for cte field.
> 
> Shouldn't allow it for HTTP anyway; illegal according to 2616.

Amy,

Do you read 2616 as saying that CTE is illegal in HTTP, period? Or just
that it cannot appear as an HTTP header? I ask because the discussion
here is about CTE on individual parts of a multipart\related package.

Gudge

Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 17:25:09 UTC