- From: Herve Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:00:30 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Cc: XMLP Dist App <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > Perhaps something like; > > """Note that MIFFY Packages using Multipart/Related may use any of the > facilities therein, including the start parameter to indicate the root > part.""" That's great for the sending side, but I would prefer stating that the receiving side MUST support this. So how about: <proposal> Note that MIFFY Packages using Multipart/Related MAY use any of the facilities therein, including the "Start" parameter to indicate the root part. Therefore, implementation supporting Multipart/Related for MIFFY Packages MUST/SHOULD handle all the facilities therein. </proposal> Hervé. > > > On Jan 14, 2004, at 7:03 AM, Herve Ruellan wrote: > >> I would like to make sure that all MIFFY or MTOM implementations >> supporting Multipart/Related packages have to support the "Start" >> parameter. >> From reading between the lines of the last MIFFY spec [1], I think >> this is the case, but I would prefer if it was explicitely said in >> section 2.1. > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 10:00:57 UTC