- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 05:23:18 -0700
- To: "Herve Ruellan" <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I think these are broadly broken down into two categories: 1. Large body of data that the sender and/or receiver whould prefer not to buffer. 2. Interleaved data. From the examples given below, the video/audio in parallel is an example of the latter while the rest are examples of the former. I can see value in supported both of these categories. Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org > [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Herve Ruellan > Sent: 07 October 2003 13:15 > To: David Fallside > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: Re: Streaming use cases for attachments > > > David, > > I think at least some of those use-cases were discussed in > the thread starting at [1], and more specificaly, Noah > pointed at some of them in [2]. > > A few use-cases extracted from [2] are: > - Large XML SOAP envelope; > - One large attachment; > - Several large attachments; > - Video + audio stream in parallel; > - Satellite transmissin in which there is value in > overlapping processing at sender an receiver. > > Regards, > > Hervé. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Sep/0043.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Sep/0061.html > > David Fallside wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > During last week's XMLP telcon, the WG decided there are probably > > multiple use-cases for streaming, although at the time it > did not identify them. > > What are they? > > > > ............................................ > > David C. Fallside, IBM > > Chair, XMLP WG > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:26:44 UTC