- From: Don Box <dbox@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:40:04 -0800
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@sun.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:37 AM > To: Amelia A. Lewis; Marc Hadley > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Amelia A. Lewis [mailto:alewis@tibco.com] > > Sent: 26 March 2003 09:20 > > To: Marc Hadley > > Cc: Martin Gudgin; xml-dist-app@w3.org > > > > In fact, you probably cannot do a DSIG over the base64 > > encoding, unless the spec better specifies how the > > transformation to base64 is to take place. > > Perhaps mandating the canonical rep defined by XML Schema[1] would help. That was my assumption - I thought we had that text in the proposal. DB
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 19:40:12 UTC