- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 07:55:41 -0700
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: rayw@netscape.com [mailto:rayw@netscape.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:49 AM > To: eugene@datapower.com > Cc: 'John J. Barton'; xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP > > What is obvious to me is that the infoset is a very poor > place to carry large binary data. Hmmm. I tend to agree, but it probably depends on what "large" means in a particular context. I'll guess that what we need are well-specified mechanisms that would allow systems designers to *either* carry reasonably-sized binary data along with the infoset when that is appropriate, or to attach references to unreasonably sized binary data for the situations where embedding it in the infoset is inappropriate. One size apparently doesn't fit all, from what I can determine from this long-running thread.
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 09:55:48 UTC