- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:14:43 -0700
- To: "Marc Hadley" <marc_hadley@mac.com>
- Cc: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, "XMLP Dist App" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Yes, this was part of the 'set-up cost' in my test. I have yet to write a test for doing base64 conversion 'in chunks' but I plan to do so soon. Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Hadley [mailto:marc_hadley@mac.com] > Sent: 12 June 2003 18:10 > To: Martin Gudgin > Cc: Jacek Kopecky; XMLP Dist App > Subject: Re: New Attachments Issues > > On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 13:39 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > > > I would observ that signature computation seems to be directly > > proportional to the size of the date being signed ( note that this > > does NOT include the initialization of the signature > computation with > > keys etc. ). Therefore, it would be reasonable to assume that > > computing the sig over base64 would take exactly a third > longer than > > computing the sig over the binary. > > > and you need to add the time to convert from binary to base64. > > Marc. > > -- > Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> > Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems. > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2003 13:14:53 UTC