- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 02:21:12 -0800
- To: "Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Noah,
I have a 'todo' to sweep the spec WRT use of xsd:QName, xsd:Name, xsd:NCName and the phrases 'XML Expanded Name', 'QName' before the FTF.
That said, I edited that section and changed xsd:Name to xsd:NCName instead of xsd:QName. This was a mistake ( as evidenced by the edtodo[1] ) which I've now fixed.
Cheers
Gudge
________________________________
From: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tue 25/02/2003 19:52
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: QName or NCName for Expanded Names?
The Editors' draft of part 1 says:
This specification uses the term XML Expanded Name to refer to the value
space pair {absolute uri reference,local-name} for a value of type
xsd:NCName. Similar terminology is under consideration for inclusion in
future versions of Namespace in XML [Namespaces in XML]. Should future
versions of namespace in XML [Namespaces in XML] adopt alternative
terminology, we anticipate that corresponding changes will be made to
this recommendation in the form of an erratum, or in conjunction with
some other future revision.
Please remind me, why does this refer to xsd:NCName instead of xsd:QName?
(Indeed, it's not clear to me why we refer to either here, since exanded
name can in principle be used for the {uri,local} pair regardless of
origin, I would think.) Thanks!
------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 05:21:34 UTC