- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 02:37:50 -0800
- To: "Jesus M. Salvo Jr." <jesus.salvo@migasia.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I know it's based on xs:boolean, but the type is NOT xs:boolean, it's a restriction of xs:boolean. Gudge ________________________________ From: Jesus M. Salvo Jr. [mailto:jesus.salvo@migasia.com] Sent: Mon 24/02/2003 23:47 To: Martin Gudgin Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug in 2.3.0 ... or bug in SOAP schema?] Martin Gudgin wrote: >Well, the canonical rep for xs:boolean is false, but this isn't xs:boolean, > You just said the problem ... the definition says: <xs:restriction base='xs:boolean'> So it is a boolean, but the representation are '0' and '1'. >it's a type that only allows the lexical reps '1' and '0', so I'm not certain that rule applies... > >I'll check with the XML Schema WG. > >Gudge > > >
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2003 05:38:12 UTC