Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug in 2.3.0 ... or bug in SOAP schema?]

Martin Gudgin wrote:

>Well, the canonical rep for xs:boolean is false, but this isn't xs:boolean, 
>

You just said the problem ... the definition says:

<xs:restriction base='xs:boolean'>


So it is a boolean, but the representation are '0' and '1'.

>it's a type that only allows the lexical reps '1' and '0', so I'm not certain that rule applies...
>
>I'll check with the XML Schema WG.
>
>Gudge
>
>  
>

Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 18:45:50 UTC