Re: treatment of ns prefixes by intermediaries

On Monday, Feb 10, 2003, at 16:47 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote:

> Although I would note that those additional changes would break a sig
> unless SOAP-N11N is used.
>
Which is why we invented it :-).

Marc.

>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Hadley [mailto:Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: 10 February 2003 13:32
>> To: Martin Gudgin
>> Cc: mlong@phalanxsys.com; Sanjiva Weerawarana; David
>> Fallside; xml-dist-app@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: treatment of ns prefixes by intermediaries
>>
>>
>> On Monday, Feb 10, 2003, at 16:09 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> (2) Must preservation in terms of values be absolute, e.g., can
>>>> MU="1" be represented as MU="true"
>>>
>>> Preservation of values is at the Infoset ( rather than PSVI
>> ) level.
>>> So for attributes [normalized value] must be preserved.
>>>
>> Note that there are specific rules for SOAP supplied attributes. E.g.
>> env:mustUnderstand="false" or env:mustUnderstand="0" can be omitted
>> from relayed messages and env:mustUnderstand="1" can be changed to
>> env:mustUnderstand="true".
>>
>> Marc.
>>
>> --
>> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
>> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
>>
>>
>>
--
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.

Received on Monday, 10 February 2003 16:53:57 UTC