- From: Herve Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:17:59 +0100
- To: XMLP Dist App <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
- Cc: "John Ibbotson" <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>
Dear all, Here is the fullfilment of the action item John and I had, concerning regenerating section 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 about generic MIME serialization and deserialization for MTOM using MIFFY. Note that those sections are now numbered 2.3.1 and 2.3.2. Hervé. ------------------- Section 2.3.1 (was 2.4.1) ------------------------- To send a SOAP message using the Abstract Transmission Optimization Feature, a SOAP application MUST generate a data model that contains type information for the SOAP message (see A.1 Infoset Mapping at Sending Nodes ). When this feature is used in combination with the SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern (ref) or the SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern (ref) described in SOAP 1.2, Part 2 (ref), the data model generated for the SOAP message MUST be represented in the value of the property corresponding to the sent SOAP message, i.e., http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage or http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage. Similar rules MUST be applied for other MEP. Implementations of this feature MUST NOT optimize a node of the SOAP message whose dm:type is either xdt:untypedAny for Element Nodesand xdt:untypedAtomic for Attribute Nodes. Implementations of this feature MAY optimize a node of the SOAP message whose dm:type is different to xdt:untypedAny for Element Nodesand xdt:untypedAtomic for Attribute Nodes, and MAY use the value of the dm:type to determine how to optimize this node. One purpose of the Abstract Transmission Optimization Feature is to optimize the transmission of base64 encoded data. To be optimized, an Element Node whose content consists of base64 encoded data MUST have a dm:type of xs:base64binary. Moreover, an Element Node of dm:type=xs:base64binary whose content is in canonical form on the sender side MUST be reconstituted as an Element Node of dm:type=xs:base64binary whose content is in canonical form on the receiver side. This feature mandates nothing for Element Node of dm:type=xs:base64binary no in canonical form. Therefore SOAP applications which need to preserve the dm:string-value of an Element Node containing base64 encoded data are advised against setting the dm:type of the Element Node to xs:base64binary. Section 2.3.2 (was 2.4.2) ------------------------- When receiving a SOAP message using an implementation of the Abstract Transmission Optimization Feature, a SOAP node MUST fault if it does not support the implementation used or the Abstract Transmission Optimization Feature. When receiving a SOAP message using an implementation of the Abstract Transmission Optimization Feature, a SOAP node binding MUST reconstruct the transmitted data model, with the following rules: - The dm:type of any or all received data model nodes may be set either as empty or indeterminate, using the mechanisms of dm:type. - For any such nodes, the dm:typed-value must be adjusted accordingly, i.e., to return the same characters as dm:string-value for elements and attributes of simple type (see dm:typed-value). For Element Nodes whose type was xs:base64binary on the sender side, the reconstructed Element Node MUST either have the same dm:string-value if enough information is available on the receiver side or have the same dm:typed-value and a dm:string-value which is in canonical form. Implementations are free to reconstruct only those portions actually needed for processing, or to present information from the message in a form convenient for efficient processing. For example, a value sent in an optimized form (e.g., binary) MAY be made available in that form as well as in the character form mandated by dm:string-value. When this feature is used in combination with the SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern (ref) or the SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern (ref) described in SOAP 1.2, Part 2 (ref), the data model reconstructed MUST be represented in the value of the property corresponding to the received SOAP message, i.e., http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage or http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage. Similar rules MUST be applied for other MEP. The receiving node MUST reconstruct from the data model an Envelope Infoset, as described in A.2 Infoset Mapping at Receiving Nodes; the receiving node MUST then perform SOAP processing on the reconstructed Infoset (see SOAP 1.2, Part 1, SOAP Processing Model).
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 05:19:46 UTC