- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:00:41 -0400
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "Hoelzing, Gerd" <gerd.hoelzing@sap.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 07:05 pm, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > In the current text [1], I would tend to agree with you that it would be > more appropriate to say that we define roles who have known URIs rather > than saying that we define role names. Throughout the spec we talk about > roles and not just their names. I'm still slightly confused, why are there two sentences, I presume the "describe" is new text: > In addition to those described above, other roles MAY be defined as > necessary to meet the needs of SOAP applications. > > In addition to the three SOAP roles defined above, other roles MAY be > defined as necessary to meet the needs of SOAP applications. Sorry for being so dense, but the roles are now clearly *identified*, the conformance requirements are clearly *described*, but where are they defined? (The term "next" is only used *once* in Part 1, and that's in the identifier...)
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 09:00:53 UTC