- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:38:33 -0700
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I notice from the minutes that people think I have amended the editor's copy of the spec with proposed resolutions to issue 302[1]. This is not the case. A change I made when I resolved EDITORIAL issue 353[2] also provided one solution to 302. I also made a proposal for a different solution. That proposal, as amended by discussion on this list, is repeated below: 1. Amend clause 4 of[3] to read: Certain graphs may sometimes contain a given edge and at other times that edge will be missing. Such missing edges can either be omitted from the serialization or can be encoded as an element information item with an xsi:nil attribute information item whose value is "true". 2. The above effectively covers ( or makes unnecessary ) the 'outbound only' case so we can amend the highlighted green text in[4] to read: An edge MAY have only a terminating graph node, that is be inbound only. Gudge [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x302 [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x353 [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml#complexenc [4] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml#graphedges
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 20:39:05 UTC