- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:56:57 -0400
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
On Thursday, Sep 12, 2002, at 14:35 US/Eastern, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > > Proposal > -------- > > I think we can clarify the current text by making the changes below. > From a semantic POW, I think these changes are in line with what we > have > now and so I don't see them as more than clarifications. > > 1) We do NOT require namespace qualification of immediate children of > the Body EII but add a note that this is recommended. That is, we > change > > Zero or more namespace qualified element > information items in its [children] property. > > to > > Zero or more element information items in its > [children] property. Such element information > items MAY be namespace qualified. > > Note: Even though it is not a requirement of > this specification, it is strongly recommended > that children element information item be > namespace qualified. > I like the direction of this proposal. In the spirit of a friendly amendment I would remove the 'element' from the first paragraph above such that it reads: Zero or more information items in its [children] property. Such child element information items MAY be namespace qualified. This generalizes the description of the Body EII to explicitly allow other types of EII. Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 15:56:59 UTC