- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:03:30 +0200
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>, Herve Ruellan <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, xml-dist-app@w3.org, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
They're not resources, but representations of resources? Personally, I think part reads better than resource in this context. Jean-Jacques. Christopher B Ferris wrote: > Well, there's 'resource' which fits in nicely with the Web architecture. > > e.g. > "Compound SOAP structure > A compound SOAP structure consists of a primary SOAP message part > and zero or more related resources." > > I would even go as far as to add: "identified by a URI".
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 06:03:44 UTC