RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay

> > Another possibility that has been raised would be to change the 
> > default behavior to be: "leave in place any header entries that are 
> > not processed". 
> I wonder what the opposition is to this solution. It seems to be the 
simplest. 

> Could you, or someone else, provide some rationale on
> why this might not fit the bill?

I could, but I would be speaking for other members of the workgroup, based 
on private communication with me. I would prefer that they speak for 
themselves, if they are so inclined.  I note that this is on the agenda 
for today's call.

Thanks!

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 12:48:04 UTC