- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 11:39:29 -0400
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:05 AM > To: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: [getf] Proposal for Web-friendly representation of RPC's in > SOAP > > Overall, I think this looks great. One quibble ... > In general, this specification concerns itself with the creation and > processing of SOAP envelopes, and does not formally constrain > the means by which RPC or non-RPC URIs are constructed for use with SOAP. I don't think this rationale is very compelling. SOAP 1.2 offers an XML serialization format for RPC parameters, so it wouldn't be out of scope to offer a URI serialization format for RPC parameters. > Thus, no standard means of mapping resource-identifying arguments or > method names to URIs is provided herein; it is anticipated that such > conventions would be developed in conjunction with the creation of > Web service description languages, language bindings, and so on. I can understand if we don't think that it can be defined quickly enough for the 1.2 timeframe, but I would *hope* that a SOAP-level argument-to-URI mapping could be standardized. If the mapping is language-specific, or requires WSDL on both sides, then interoperability would be greatly reduced.
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 11:40:04 UTC