RE: Issue: Problem with ProcedureNotPresent fault subcode

Yup, MAY is fine - I can also live without it entirely but happy with
MAY.

Henrik

>> Good, I think that's a good compromise, if others agree.  I could 
>> probably
>> live without the subcode entirely, or maybe better yet, a 
>subcode that's 
>> not specific to RPC.  Why not have a general subcode: 
>"bodyNotRecognized", 
>> which would apply uniformly to RPC and non-RPC responses.  
>Again, I can 
>> live with ProcedureNotPresent as a MAY.  Many thanks!

Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 14:32:14 UTC