- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:00:39 -0400
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
At 10:54 AM +0100 7/24/02, Martin Gudgin wrote: >You missed one, http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc > >Remember, thou shalt count to three, not four and five is way out, > >Looks like we have two too many > That is a lot. This doesn't feel fundamentally wrong to me, like having some elements in a namespace and some not, so if it makes sense go for it. But does it make sense? Do you actually need this level of differentiation? Could you distinguish based on a single namespace URI and the local name alone? Would life be simpler with just one or two namespaces for SOAP? This is a practical matter. Do whatever works better. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 09:37:14 UTC