- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 16:03:18 +0200
- To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- CC: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Upon reflexion, I am wondering whether we should not just rename Web-Method GET to something different. I know Web-Method GET is very related to HTTP GET (although different), but it sounds like we have created confusion. Jean-Jacques. Marc Hadley wrote: > Mark Baker wrote: > >>It sounds like you are drawing a distinction between an abstract > >>conceptual GET operation and the implementation of that operation in > >>HTTP. Unfortunately both are being labelled with the name 'GET' so it is > >>difficult to tell which one you are referring to in any given sentence. > > > > FWIW, I'm making this distinction only as an aid to explaining my point. > > Maybe it's not working. 8-O > > > No, it isn't ;-). If they had different labels it might work but using > the same term to refer to two different but related things is just plain > confusing.
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 10:03:48 UTC