xml-dist-app@w3.org from July 2002 by date

Thursday, 1 August 2002

• Re: New AFTF draft. Christopher B Ferris

Wednesday, 31 July 2002

• Request for some quick guidance on XMLP Issue 269 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Comments on LC issues Asir S Vedamuthu
• New AFTF draft. w3.ruellan@laposte.net

Tuesday, 30 July 2002

• SOAP version Mark Baker

Monday, 29 July 2002

• Re: Web method values as QNames (was Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Comments from the Multi-modal Iinteraction WG on LC SOAP 1.2 Glen Daniels
• Comments from the Multi-modal Iinteraction WG on LC SOAP 1.2 Dahl, Deborah A

Sunday, 28 July 2002

• base64 encoding Jose Rodriguez
• base64 Jose Rodriguez

Friday, 26 July 2002

• Re: Request/response correlation in Email/SMTP binding Graham Klyne
• Request/response correlation in Email/SMTP binding Lars von Wedel

Thursday, 25 July 2002

• RE: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Last Call Working Draft SOAP 1.2 part 0, French translation Carine Bournez
• http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix Frank-Thomas.Assmann@im.landsh.de
• ANN: Systinet WASP SOAP 1.2 endpoint up Jacek Kopecky
• RE: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) Williams, Stuart
• Re: Comments on LC issues Pete Hendry
• Re: Comments on LC issues Robert van Engelen
• RE: implementation features comments Thompson, Lynne R
• Re: Comments on LC issues Pete Hendry

Wednesday, 24 July 2002

• RE: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) Williams, Stuart
• FW: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) Williams, Stuart
• FW: LC #219 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) Williams, Stuart
• Simulating an http post Jon Leigh
• Re: Axis implementation summary Jacek Kopecky
• Axis implementation summary Glen Daniels
• RE: [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really Features optional ) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comments on LC issues Jacek Kopecky
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really Features optional ) Williams, Stuart
• Re: fault/detail Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: fault/detail Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: fault/detail Martin Gudgin
• Re: fault/detail Marc Hadley

Tuesday, 23 July 2002

• Re: fault/detail Martin Gudgin
• Re: fault/detail Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: fault/detail Martin Gudgin
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really Features optional ) Williams, Stuart
• Re: fault/detail Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: fault/detail Jacek Kopecky
• Re: fault/detail Martin Gudgin
• Re: Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2 Martin Gudgin
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really Features optional) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comments on LC issues Robert van Engelen
• Re: fault/detail noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comments on LC issues noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 22 July 2002

• Re: Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2 Martin Gudgin
• Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2 Naresh Agarwal
• Re: New issues with #195 and section 3.1.5.3 Jacek Kopecky

Saturday, 20 July 2002

• Re: fault/detail Martin Gudgin

Friday, 19 July 2002

• Comments on LC issues Robert van Engelen
• Systinet Last Call comments Jacek Kopecky
• Re: text/xml vs. application/soap Mark Baker
• Re: text/xml vs. application/soap Laird Popkin
• RE: fault/detail Don Mullen
• Additional implementation feature suggestion Jacek Kopecky
• Re: fault/detail Pete Hendry
• Re: ACTION REQUIRED: implementation features comments Yves Lafon
• RE: implementation features comments Jacek Kopecky
• Re: fault/detail Jacek Kopecky
• Re: fault/detail Pete Hendry
• ACTION REQUIRED: implementation features comments David Fallside

Thursday, 18 July 2002

• Re: text/xml vs. application/soap Jacek Kopecky
• Re: fault/detail Jacek Kopecky
• text/xml vs. application/soap Grahame Grieve
• Re: fault/detail Rich Salz
• implementation features comments Jacek Kopecky
• Re: fault/detail Martin Gudgin
• Re: AFTF: new draft (resent) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: AFTF: new draft (resent) Williams, Stuart
• Re: fault/detail Grahame Grieve
• Re: fault/detail Martin Gudgin
• Re: fault/detail Simon Fell
• RE: FW: Two new Internet drafts: DIME and WS-Attachments Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) Pete Hendry

Wednesday, 17 July 2002

• Re: fault/detail Martin Gudgin
• RE: FW: Two new Internet drafts: DIME and WS-Attachments Jacek Kopecky
• RE: FW: Two new Internet drafts: DIME and WS-Attachments Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: ACTION REQ: SOAP 1.2 part 1, "features" list. Jacek Kopecky
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] Herve Ruellan
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] Herve Ruellan
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] Herve Ruellan
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] Herve Ruellan
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] Herve Ruellan
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] Herve Ruellan
• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) Ray Whitmer
• SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature Herve Ruellan
• fault/detail Simon Fell
• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) Pete Hendry

Tuesday, 16 July 2002

• Issue: RPC and Encoding fault combinations Jacek Kopecky
• Re: New issues with #195 and section 3.1.5.3 Ray Whitmer
• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) Ray Whitmer
• Summary of positions on LC #227/#228 re: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• New issues with #195 and section 3.1.5.3 Robert van Engelen
• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) Pete Hendry

Monday, 15 July 2002

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Paul Prescod
• Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) Jacek Kopecky
• Web method values as QNames (was Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature rubys@us.ibm.com
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Christopher B Ferris
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Jacek Kopecky
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: FW: Two new Internet drafts: DIME and WS-Attachments Jacek Kopecky
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker

Sunday, 14 July 2002

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Asynchronous Web Services! Jacek Kopecky

Saturday, 13 July 2002

• ACTION REQ: SOAP 1.2 part 1, "features" list. David Fallside

Friday, 12 July 2002

• Re: LC Issue 210 Marc Hadley

Thursday, 11 July 2002

• RE: LC Issue 210 Thompson, Lynne R
• RE: LC Issue 210 Kevin Johnsrude
• Re: LC Issue 210 Martin Gudgin
• Re: LC Issue 210 Marc Hadley
• LC Issue 210 Kevin Johnsrude
• Re: LC Issue 229 Marc Hadley
• Re: LC Issue 229 Christopher B Ferris
• RE: LC-Issue #230 Don Mullen
• LC Issue 229 Marc Hadley
• LC Issue 217 Marc Hadley
• Re: LC-Issue #230 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: LC-Issue #230 Glen Daniels

Wednesday, 10 July 2002

• LC-Issue #230 Don Mullen

Tuesday, 9 July 2002

• Re: mail and URIs (was RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature) Amelia A Lewis
• Re: SMTP and GET Amelia A Lewis
• SMTP and GET Mark Baker
• mail and URIs (was RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature) Mike Dierken
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Amelia A Lewis
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mike Dierken
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Amelia A Lewis
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mike Dierken
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Walden Mathews
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Amelia A Lewis
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Amelia A Lewis
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mike Dierken
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Marc Hadley
• RE: Application or Infrastructure? (was FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature) (fwd) Yves Lafon
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• Ann: WSDL 1.2 first draft published Jonathan Marsh
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Paul Prescod
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Amelia A Lewis
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Marc Hadley
• Re: Application or Infrastructure? (was FW: LC Comments: Web Method F eature) Paul Prescod
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Application or Infrastructure? (was FW: LC Comments: Web Method F eature) Champion, Mike
• Re: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) Laird Popkin

Monday, 8 July 2002

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Paul Prescod
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) Paul Prescod
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) Grahame Grieve
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) Eugene Kuznetsov
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) Paul Prescod
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Marc Hadley
• RE: Asynchronous Web Services! Naresh Agarwal
• RE: Asynchronous Web Services! Naresh Agarwal
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Walden Mathews
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Walden Mathews
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Marc Hadley
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Marc Hadley
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) Eugene Kuznetsov

Sunday, 7 July 2002

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Paul Prescod
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Glen Daniels
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Gavin Thomas Nicol

Saturday, 6 July 2002

• RE: Asynchronous Web Services! Champion, Mike
• Re: Asynchronous Web Services! Kurt Cagle
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Champion, Mike
• Asynchronous Web Services! Naresh Agarwal
• "distributed computing" Mark Baker
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Amelia A. Lewis
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Paul Prescod

Friday, 5 July 2002

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Champion, Mike
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Walden Mathews
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Champion, Mike
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart

Thursday, 4 July 2002

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Jacek Kopecky
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Marc Hadley
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart

Wednesday, 3 July 2002

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• RE: SOAP 1.2 Encoding and forward references Brad Taylor
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? Jacek Kopecky
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• Re: Changing the default value of mustUnderstand to "true" noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Marc Hadley
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart
• Re: Changing the default value of mustUnderstand to "true" Jean-Jacques Moreau

Tuesday, 2 July 2002

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Mark Baker
• RE: MEP in SOAP1.2 Williams, Stuart
• RE: MEP in SOAP1.2 Naresh Agarwal
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? Marc Hadley
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? Marc Hadley
• handling merged XML file with XSL... Ashish Gupta
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? Marc Hadley
• Re: SOAP 1.2 Encoding and forward references Marc Hadley

Monday, 1 July 2002

• SOAP 1.2 Implementation Request from XMLP WG David Fallside
• SOAP 1.2 Encoding and forward references Brad Taylor
• [Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-01.txt] Mark Baker
• RE: MEP in SOAP1.2 Williams, Stuart
• MEP in SOAP1.2 Naresh Agarwal
• FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature Williams, Stuart

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2002 23:07:39 UTC