- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:43:54 -0500
- To: <tjewald@develop.com>
- Cc: "'XMLDISTAPP'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Stay tuned. Gudge and I have an action item to write this up. Short answer: validation is not requried. When you're not validating, you'll know the name of the type, but not even whether it is simple or complex. If you choose to validate, then the type must match the element. So, if your element is a struct, it should be complex. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ "Tim Ewald" <tjewald@develop.com> Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org 02/23/2002 01:57 PM Please respond to tjewald To: "'XMLDISTAPP'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org> cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: using xsi:type with the SOAP encoding rules What happens if a SOAP encoded message uses xsi:type to describe an element's content in terms of a XSD complexType? Is this explicilty allowed or disallowed under the SOAP encoding rules, or is it simply not addressed? Thanks, Tim-
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2002 20:59:26 UTC