- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:20:40 -0800
- To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@Sun.COM>, <rsalz@zolera.com>, "xml-dist-app" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sounds perfect to me - thank you! Henrik >I agree. We do need to say something about where blocks can >be inserted. >I would suggest a default behavior that blocks can be inserted >anywhere in >the header, with the usual proviso that mU headers targeted to >the node >can change the rules. Does that sound right? ... >We should by no means preclude even stricter constraints but >it might be better to leave that to our normal extensibility >mechanism. For example, if one wants to control the complete >order of ALL blocks through ALL SOAP nodes in a message path, >would this not be better accomplished by providing a next hop >block that indicates this additional constraint on every node?
Received on Saturday, 23 February 2002 17:22:13 UTC