- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:25:16 +0100 (CET)
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Hi all, I was tasked to draft a resolution for the issue #59 [1]. The issue is about requirement 609 which says "The XMLP specification may mandate the use of a specific character encoding". During the telcon discussion, the sentiment was that since the spec is now infoset based, this issue should only matter to transport bindings which serialize the infoset. XML 1.0 requires that processors support at least the encodings UTF-8 and UTF-16, other encodings may be supported. The proposed resolution text: >>It is the responsibility of transport bindings to specify how the infoset is being transfered to and reconstituted by the binding at the receiving node. Such a binding, if using XML 1.0 serialization of the infoset, may mandate that a particular character encoding or set of encodings be used. The SOAP HTTP binding does not mandate any character encoding. When using other encodings than UTF-8 and UTF-16 (mandated by the XML 1.0 specification), the application designer must be aware of possible interoperability issues. It is therefore advisable that messages sent to unknown endpoints use UTF-8 or UTF-16.<< Best regards, Jacek Kopecky Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) http://www.systinet.com/
Received on Friday, 22 February 2002 08:25:17 UTC