- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:41:45 -0800
- To: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Cc: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org, Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>, Paul Prescod <paulp@activestate.com>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Paul Prescod wrote: > If you (and they) would separate out your data model from your > syntax then this would be even easier. XML is *just a data format*. > If it gets in the way, get rid of it! Exactly! If the WG defines a mechanism whereby different data models from the envelope can be serialised into the URI, GET becomes easy, as long as the other limitations of GET are acknowledged. The obvious serialisation to start with is of section 5 encoding. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 13:41:50 UTC