Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble.

I had thought the charter was quite close; see [1], section 4.2, 3rd paragraph:

     "The Working Group will look at various ways of deploying XML Protocol
     in a manner that is compatible with the existing Web infrastructure."



Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Sure, but that isn't the point; the point is that SOAP 1.2 doesn't
> offer a way to make idempotent requests in a way that is compatible
> with the Web architecture. The WG's HTTP binding is, at best,
> incomplete, *if* "compatibility with the Web architecture" is
> considered a requirement.
> Such a requirement isn't stated in the Requirements document or the
> Charter.

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 12:22:12 UTC