- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:06:28 -0000
- To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>
- Cc: "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
The fact that the RPC mapping spells out that you have to use elements with
names derived a certain way. It does not allow attributes, or other element
names to be used. Seems pretty clear cut to me.
Gudge
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
Cc: "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: RPC/Encoding dependency
> Gudge,
> it's unclear to me what makes you think that specifying an other
> encoding (of our data model) is prohibited on the RPC request or
> response structs.
> Kind regards,
>
> Jacek Kopecky
>
> Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
> http://www.systinet.com/
>
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote:
>
> > In the editors copy of Part 2[1], section 4.1[2] states;
> >
> > 'As noted above, RPC invocation and response structs can be encoded
> > according to the rules in 3 SOAP Encoding, or other encodings can be
> > specified using the encodingStyle attribute'
> >
> > While I grant that strictly speaking for each parameter accessor I
could use
> > a different encoding, the encoding of the procedure/method signature
is, by
> > definition, the same as Section 3[3] encoding. For example, given the
> > following COM IDL method signature
> >
> > void Add ( [in] long x, [in] long y, [out] long* sum );
> >
> > I could not encode the request as;
> >
> > <Add x='10' y='20'
xmlns:soap='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope'
> > soap:encodingStyle='urn:example-org:attrenc' />
> >
> > in fact, I could ONLY encode the request as;
> >
> > <Add xmlns:soap='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope'
> > soap:encodingStyle='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding' >
> > <X>10</x>
> > <y>20</y>
> > </Add>
> >
> > Given the following IDL
> >
> > struct Point
> > {
> > long x,y;
> > }
> >
> > void Add ( [in] struct Point pt1,
> > [in] struct Point pt2,
> > [out] struct Point* ptret );
> >
> > I *could* encode each point using something other than section 3;
> >
> > <Add xmlns:soap='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope'
> > soap:encodingStyle='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding' >
> > <pt1 x='10' y='20' soap:encoding='urn:example-org:attrenc' />
> > <pt2 y='10' x='20' soap:encoding='urn:example-org:attrenc' />
> > </Add>
> >
> > but the request element is always serialized according to Section 3.
> >
> > Gudge
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.xml
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.xml#IDAGG5CF
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.xml#soapenc
> >
>
Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 13:49:59 UTC