- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:06:28 -0000
- To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>
- Cc: "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
The fact that the RPC mapping spells out that you have to use elements with names derived a certain way. It does not allow attributes, or other element names to be used. Seems pretty clear cut to me. Gudge ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com> To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com> Cc: "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:19 AM Subject: Re: RPC/Encoding dependency > Gudge, > it's unclear to me what makes you think that specifying an other > encoding (of our data model) is prohibited on the RPC request or > response structs. > Kind regards, > > Jacek Kopecky > > Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) > http://www.systinet.com/ > > > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > > In the editors copy of Part 2[1], section 4.1[2] states; > > > > 'As noted above, RPC invocation and response structs can be encoded > > according to the rules in 3 SOAP Encoding, or other encodings can be > > specified using the encodingStyle attribute' > > > > While I grant that strictly speaking for each parameter accessor I could use > > a different encoding, the encoding of the procedure/method signature is, by > > definition, the same as Section 3[3] encoding. For example, given the > > following COM IDL method signature > > > > void Add ( [in] long x, [in] long y, [out] long* sum ); > > > > I could not encode the request as; > > > > <Add x='10' y='20' xmlns:soap='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope' > > soap:encodingStyle='urn:example-org:attrenc' /> > > > > in fact, I could ONLY encode the request as; > > > > <Add xmlns:soap='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope' > > soap:encodingStyle='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding' > > > <X>10</x> > > <y>20</y> > > </Add> > > > > Given the following IDL > > > > struct Point > > { > > long x,y; > > } > > > > void Add ( [in] struct Point pt1, > > [in] struct Point pt2, > > [out] struct Point* ptret ); > > > > I *could* encode each point using something other than section 3; > > > > <Add xmlns:soap='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope' > > soap:encodingStyle='http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding' > > > <pt1 x='10' y='20' soap:encoding='urn:example-org:attrenc' /> > > <pt2 y='10' x='20' soap:encoding='urn:example-org:attrenc' /> > > </Add> > > > > but the request element is always serialized according to Section 3. > > > > Gudge > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.xml > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.xml#IDAGG5CF > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.xml#soapenc > > >
Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 13:49:59 UTC