- From: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:19:01 -0800
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0, Part 1 and Part 2 are W3C Candidate Recommendations, see: Part 0 at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/ Part 1 at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/ Part 2 at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/ =================================================== Working Group Goals During Candidate Recommendation =================================================== A preliminary implementation report that records 6 implementations in terms of their coverage of features in the specification is available at: http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/03/soap1.2implementation.html The Working Group has agreed to 3 exit criteria for the Candidate Recommendation: 1. Implementation experience has been gathered to demonstrate that SOAP processors based on the specification are implementable and have compatible behaviors. 2. An implementation report shows that there are at least two different and interoperable implementations of every mandatory and optional feature. The evidence for this report is currently being summarized at http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/03/soap1.2implementation.html 3. Formal responses to all comments received by the Working Group. The estimated end date of this Candidate Recommendation period is 24 January 2003. After Candidate Recommendation, the Working Group expects to publish an updated version of its "SOAP Version 1.2 Specification Assertions and Test Collection" document based on information received during the Candidate Recommendation period: http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/10/LC/soap12-testcollection.html =================================== What Candidate Recommendation Means =================================== Excerpted from the Process Document, section 5.2, the description of Candidate Recommendation: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/tr.html#Recs A Candidate Recommendation is believed to meet the relevant requirements of the Working Group's charter and any accompanying requirements documents, and has been published in order to gather implementation experience and feedback. Advancement of a technical report to Candidate Recommendation is an explicit call for implementation experience to those outside of the related Working Groups or the W3C itself. ............................................ David C. Fallside, IBM Ext Ph: 530.477.7169 Int Ph: 544.9665 fallside@us.ibm.com
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 11:22:01 UTC