- From: Ray Whitmer <rayw@netscape.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 11:50:01 -0800
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: fallside@us.ibm.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: >I guess I don't really understand what you're trying to >say here. Adapting what to the subset? Is there >something out there that had some XML lying around and you >want to use SOAP to send that fragment? If that's your >concern, why is that not covered by the sentence I >included that said: "The tradeoff is that we have >somewhat complicated things for those who prefer to use >certain off-the-shelf processors, and for those who >want to insert arbitrary XML into SOAP messages (there >are many other problems doing that...a longer story >than we have time for here.)" > > You are right, it is covered. Sorry. That is all the rest of my message was discussing. Thanks for your help on these issues. While I think that these "tradeoffs" could be seen as possible reasons for applications not to subset XML on their own, I hope they are seen as reasons for the TAG to standardize a subset that matches SOAP that could encourage tools that support the subset that permit efficient processing of the subset, detection of violations, development of more subset applications that will more-directly interoperate, etc. Ray
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 14:50:24 UTC