xml-dist-app@w3.org from September 2001 by date

Monday, 1 October 2001

Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Nottingham
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Baker
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Nottingham
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Nottingham
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Baker

Sunday, 30 September 2001

RE: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declarati on and PIs in SOAP) Champion, Mike
Re: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) Paul Denning

Saturday, 29 September 2001

Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Rich Salz
RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Doug Davis

Friday, 28 September 2001

Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Baker

Thursday, 20 September 2001

RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Champion, Mike

Saturday, 29 September 2001

Re: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) Bob Hutchison

Friday, 28 September 2001

Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Baker
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Nottingham
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Nottingham
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution christopher ferris
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution Mark Nottingham
RE: SOAP Versioning Larry Masinter
Re: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) christopher ferris
Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) Marc Hadley
Issue #12 proposed resolution christopher ferris
Netscape 4.76 - Sun Curtis Alphin
F2f minutes Yves Lafon

Thursday, 27 September 2001

RE: SOAP Versioning Robert Shmit

Wednesday, 26 September 2001

RE: SOAP Versioning Oisin Hurley

Tuesday, 25 September 2001

Re: Header/Details Considered Harmful Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
SOAP Versioning Martin Gudgin

Monday, 24 September 2001

SOAP Versioning Martin Gudgin
Re: Header/Details Considered Harmful Steve Vinoski
Header/Details Considered Harmful Jones, Matthew
Re: About Chinese version of SOAP 1.2 Draft David Fallside
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mike Dierken
About Chinese version of SOAP 1.2 Draft Fennivel Chai

Sunday, 23 September 2001

Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Tyler Close

Friday, 21 September 2001

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect David Orchard
RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?] Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type dec laration and PIs in SOAP?] Champion, Mike
RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?] Andrew Layman
Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?] Eric van der Vlist
Re: XML Schema Vs. DTD - Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Eric van der Vlist
XML Schema Vs. DTD - Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Kremena Gotcheva
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? christopher ferris
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? christopher ferris
RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Champion, Mike
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Champion, Mike
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? christopher ferris
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Rich Salz
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Pete Hendry
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? christopher ferris
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Jacek Kopecky
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Rich Salz
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Rich Salz
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Jacek Kopecky
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Jacek Kopecky
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Alan Kent
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Rich Salz
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Alan Kent
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Rich Salz
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Alan Kent
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Rich Salz
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 20 September 2001

Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Baker
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Baker
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Williams, Stuart
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect John J. Barton
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Rich Salz
RE: sparse arrays - too complex? Andrew Layman
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Eric van der Vlist
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? christopher ferris
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Rich Salz
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect John J. Barton
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Francis Norton
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Marc Hadley
RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Champion, Mike
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jacek Kopecky
why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Jacek Kopecky
[xml-dist-app] <none> cboonchin@yahoo.com
Issues with SOAP 1.2 part 1 Editors Draft Williams, Stuart
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Jacek Kopecky
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jacek Kopecky
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jacek Kopecky
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
Re: SOAP Application christopher ferris

Wednesday, 19 September 2001

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Andrew Layman
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Baker
RE: SOAP Application Williams, Stuart
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mike Dierken
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Andrew Layman
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
Minutes of the 5 September 2001 teleconference Hugo Haas
SOAP Application christopher ferris
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Andrew Layman
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mike Dierken
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mike Dierken
Re: Proposal for Issues 11/13 Mark Nottingham
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Baker
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jacek Kopecky
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jones, Matthew
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Graham Klyne
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jacek Kopecky
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Rich Salz
RE: Proposal for Issues 11/13 Williams, Stuart
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Williams, Stuart
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jacek Kopecky
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect christopher ferris
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect christopher ferris
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jacek Kopecky
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Baker
Proposal for Issues 11/13 Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect christopher ferris
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect christopher ferris
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Andrew Layman
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect John J. Barton
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Nottingham
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Larry Masinter
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jacek Kopecky
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect christopher ferris
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Rich Salz
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jacek Kopecky
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Dick Brooks

Monday, 17 September 2001

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Dan Kohn
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect John J. Barton
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Baker
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jones, Matthew
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Simon St.Laurent
RE: [xml-dev] Pakistan has an English-language weblog Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect John J. Barton
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect christopher ferris
issue 95 resolution christopher ferris
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Bob Cunnings
RE: Questions about the SOAP 2.1 draft Jones, Matthew
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Mark Baker
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Jones, Matthew
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect Simon St.Laurent
text/xml for SOAP is incorrect mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp

Sunday, 16 September 2001

Pakistan has an English-language weblog Dave Winer
Re: Questions about the SOAP 2.1 draft Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 15 September 2001

RE: Questions about the SOAP 2.1 draft Oisin Hurley

Friday, 14 September 2001

Questions about the SOAP 2.1 draft Jones, Matthew

Thursday, 13 September 2001

RE: I-D on HTTP resource state model Mike Dierken
RE: discarding incorrect namespaces Williams, Stuart

Wednesday, 12 September 2001

XML Core response to XMLP request on xml:base in SOAP David Orchard
Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Mark Nottingham
Re: I-D on HTTP resource state model Mark Baker
Re: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base Richard Tobin
Re: I-D on HTTP resource state model Rich Salz
RE: discarding incorrect namespaces Williams, Stuart
I-D on HTTP resource state model Mark Baker

Tuesday, 11 September 2001

new issue on Processing SOAP Messages Mark Jones
RE: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base Jonathan Marsh
Re: encodings in RPC Jacek Kopecky

Monday, 10 September 2001

I hava question... 이선헌
Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Mark Nottingham
Presence of the detail element in a SOAP Fault indicating processing of the SOAP Body Hugo Haas
Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Hugo Haas
RE: Sun and independent developers Anne Thomas Manes

Sunday, 9 September 2001

Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Larry Masinter
Re: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Saturday, 8 September 2001

Re: Sun and independent developers Dave Winer
Re: Sun and independent developers Dave Winer
Re: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base Daniel Veillard

Friday, 7 September 2001

XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base David Orchard
RE: Sun and independent developers Fuchs, Matthew
Re: Sun and independent developers Dan Brickley
RE: Sun and independent developers Paulo Gaspar
RE: Sun and independent developers Paulo Gaspar
Re: Sun and independent developers Dave Winer
RE: Sun and independent developers Joshua Allen
Re: Sun and independent developers Kurt Cagle
RE: Sun and independent developers Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: Proposed text for closure of issue 45 Hugo Haas
RE: Sun and independent developers Paulo Gaspar
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors Marc Hadley
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Williams, Stuart

Thursday, 6 September 2001

Minutes of the 29 August 2001 teleconference Hugo Haas
Re: [xml-rpc] Re: Sun and independent developers Skip Montanaro
RE: Proposed text for XMLBase Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors christopher ferris
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors Mark Jones
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors Mark Nottingham
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Sun and independent developers Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: Sun and independent developers Dave Winer
RE: Sun and independent developers Anne Thomas Manes
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Mark Jones
Sun and independent developers Dave Winer
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors christopher ferris
RE: Proposed text for XMLBase David Orchard
RE: Issue 19 closed Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Issue 19 closed Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Encoding XML in URIs Mark Nottingham
RE: Encoding XML in URIs Larry Masinter
Re: Encoding XML in URIs Mark Baker
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Encoding XML in URIs Mark Nottingham
Re: Encoding XML in URIs Paul Prescod

Wednesday, 5 September 2001

Encoding XML in URIs Mark Nottingham
Re: SOAPAction Proposal Mark Nottingham
RE: Proposed text for XMLBase Champion, Mike
RE: SOAPAction Proposal Doug Davis
RE: SOAPAction Proposal Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
XML Protocol WG response to XML Schema base64 questions Martin Gudgin

Tuesday, 4 September 2001

RE: SOAPAction Proposal Williams, Stuart
Re: SOAPAction Proposal Mark Nottingham
RE: SOAPAction Proposal Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: SOAPAction Proposal Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: SOAPAction Proposal Doug Davis
Re: SOAPAction Proposal Mark Nottingham
RE: SOAPAction Proposal Williams, Stuart
Re: SOAPAction Proposal Rich Salz
Re: SOAPAction Proposal Doug Davis
Re: SOAPAction Proposal Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: SOAPAction Proposal Doug Davis

Monday, 3 September 2001

Ordering of Processing [was: Regrets / Issue 71] Mark Nottingham
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Doug Davis
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Mark Jones
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? Kurt Cagle
Re: Proposed text for closure of issue 45 Marc Hadley
sparse arrays - too complex? Alan Kent

Saturday, 1 September 2001

Re: Issue 71: Additional actors Mark Nottingham

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:49:04 UTC