xml-dist-app@w3.org from November 2001 by date

Friday, 30 November 2001

Transport Binding Reviews David Fallside
Re: i154: are roles invariant? Paul Denning
Possible issue: uniqueness of IDs Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Merry Christmas! Sam
RE: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: i154: are roles invariant? Herve Ruellan
Re: i154: are roles invariant? Rich Salz
Re: i154: are roles invariant? Christopher Ferris

Thursday, 29 November 2001

Missing testable assertions (scan of part 1 section 4) Hugo Haas
Re: i154: are roles invariant? Doug Davis
Proposed text for issue 155 Doug Davis
Re: i154: are roles invariant? Bob Cunnings
SOAP and dynamic structures David E. Cleary
Re: i154: are roles invariant? Yves Lafon
i154: are roles invariant? Jean-Jacques Moreau
RE: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review Nilo Mitra (EMX)
New XML web application server don
Re: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Wednesday, 28 November 2001

RE: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review Nilo Mitra (EMX)
messages only as documents? Dave Waite
Re: TBTF Intro text comment Raj Nair
RE: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Williams, Stuart
Remove NOTATION type Martin Gudgin
Re: TBTF Intro text comment Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
TBTF Intro text comment Raj Nair

Tuesday, 27 November 2001

minutes of 21/11/2001 teleconference Yves Lafon
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks James M Snell
Re: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review Jean-Jacques Moreau
RE: proposed resolution for issue #18 - "top level" unclear Andrew Layman

Monday, 26 November 2001

Re: ETF: Issue 47 (SOAP Data Model) Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Doug Davis
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks Doug Davis

Friday, 23 November 2001

RE: proposed resolution for issue #18 - "top level" unclear Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Boxcarring out of scope? Jean-Jacques Moreau

Thursday, 22 November 2001

Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks Jacek Kopecky
Re: Boxcarring out of scope? Marc Hadley
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks Jean-Jacques Moreau
minutes of 7/11 and 14/11 teleconferences Yves Lafon
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks Jean-Jacques Moreau
Boxcarring out of scope? Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 21 November 2001

RE: proposed resolution to issues #159 and #166 - encodingStyle Jacek Kopecky
RE: counterproposal on issue #144 Murali Janakiraman
RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Scott Cantor
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Christopher Ferris
RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Williams, Stuart
ETF: Issue 47 (SOAP Data Model) Marc Hadley
Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Rich Salz
ETF: Issue 162 (Use of ABNF in production rules) Marc Hadley
Re: counterproposal on issue #144 Jacek Kopecky
RE: counterproposal on issue #144 Jacek Kopecky
Re: counterproposal on issue #144 Jacek Kopecky
Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Alan Kent
Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Rich Salz
Re: counterproposal on issue #144 'Alan Kent'
RE: counterproposal on issue #144 Murali Janakiraman
RE: counterproposal on issue #144 Murali Janakiraman
Re: counterproposal on issue #144 Alan Kent

Tuesday, 20 November 2001

Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Alan Kent
Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Alan Kent
Meta issue 54 [1]--proposed resolution Marwan Sabbouh
RE: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Andrew Layman
RE: counterproposal on issue #144 Andrew Layman
RE: proposed resolution to issues #159 and #166 - encodingStyle Andrew Layman
Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks Rich Salz
Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks Jacek Kopecky
Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks Rich Salz
Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks Jacek Kopecky
Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks Rich Salz
New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks Jacek Kopecky
Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Rich Salz
Re: Proposal for resolving #171 - attributes on references Rich Salz
proposed resolution to issues #159 and #166 - encodingStyle Jacek Kopecky
counterproposal on issue #144 Jacek Kopecky
Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Alan Kent
Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Jacek Kopecky
Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Alan Kent
proposed resolution to issue #117 Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for resolving #171 - attributes on references Jacek Kopecky
latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for resolving #171 - attributes on references Rich Salz
Proposal for resolving #171 - attributes on references Jacek Kopecky

Monday, 19 November 2001

Latest Usage Scenarios John Ibbotson
RE: Issue 153: overlapping section 2 and 4 Williams, Stuart
Re: Typo in Example 2 Marc Hadley
Re: Issue 153: overlapping section 2 and 4 Doug Davis

Saturday, 17 November 2001

FYI: DIME available as IETF internet draft Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Doug Davis
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Doug Davis
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Friday, 16 November 2001

Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Doug Davis
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Martin Gudgin
SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review Nilo Mitra (EMX)
Error ... Guillermo González Arroyave
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Mark Baker
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Martin Gudgin
RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Issue 32/R307: Suitability for use across organisational boundar ies Williams, Stuart
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Martin Gudgin
Re: Formalism in SOAP spec Martin Gudgin

Thursday, 15 November 2001

S21 proposed sample implementation Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for resolving issue 40: Support resource constrained devices Simon Fell
Re: Proposal for resolving issue 40: Support resource constrained devices Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Typo in Example 2 Raghu Rajah
RE: Formalism in SOAP spec MacAndrew, Tim
Soap namespaces.. BSanjay
Re: Proposal for resolving issue 40: Support resource constrained devices Jacek Kopecky
RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Doug Davis
RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Mark Baker
RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Nilo Mitra (EMX)
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Formalism in SOAP spec Martin Gudgin
Re: RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Doug Davis
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jean-Jacques Moreau
RE: Usage Scenarios John Ibbotson
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Alan Kent
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Alan Kent
RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Alan Kent
RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Wednesday, 14 November 2001

RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
In Memoriam - Henry Lowe Mark Baker
RE: Formalism in SOAP spec Jones, Matthew
RE: Formalism in SOAP spec MacAndrew, Tim
RE: Usage Scenarios Nilo Mitra (EMX)
RE: Formalism in SOAP spec Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Request to open new issue: version faults vs. client faults Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Issue 169: Forward References in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Issue 146 proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jacek Kopecky
RE: Formalism in SOAP spec Jones, Matthew
Re: Issue 169: Forward References in SOAP Encoding Simon Fell
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jean-Jacques Moreau
RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Murali Janakiraman
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Doug Davis
Re: Proposal for resolving issue 40: Support resource constrained devices Hugo Haas
RE: Formalism in SOAP spec Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Issue 169: Forward References in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
Formalism in SOAP spec Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Jacek Kopecky
Issue 169: Forward References in SOAP Encoding Asir S Vedamuthu
RE: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
minutes of 31/10/2001 teleconference Yves Lafon

Tuesday, 13 November 2001

Re: Summary: Sparse Arrays Alan Kent
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
XML processing bdawson@miramar.com
RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Murali Janakiraman
Re: Summary: Sparse Arrays Asir S Vedamuthu
Re: Summary: Sparse Arrays Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Marc Hadley
Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Summary: Sparse Arrays Asir S Vedamuthu
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Rich Salz
RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Marc Hadley
RE: Issue 68 - status information Oisin Hurley
Re: Issue 68 - status information Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Comments on issue 101 Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Alan Kent

Monday, 12 November 2001

Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Rich Salz
RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Murali Janakiraman
Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Marc Hadley
Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Rich Salz
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Doug Davis
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Jacek Kopecky

Sunday, 11 November 2001

I-D ACTION:draft-baker-http-resource-state-model-01.txt (fwd) Mark Baker

Saturday, 10 November 2001

[Fwd: [soapbuilders] Invitation to join "Round 2" interop testing] Rich Salz

Friday, 9 November 2001

Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Spaces allowed in XML element names Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Spaces allowed in XML element names RGerber@iworksoftware.com
SOAP v1.1 ========> SOAP v1.2 Pae Choi

Thursday, 8 November 2001

Hi Enrico Zerilli

Friday, 9 November 2001

Re: Comments on issue 101 Jean-Jacques Moreau
RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Murali Janakiraman

Thursday, 8 November 2001

RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Andrew Layman
RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing Murali Janakiraman
Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Rich Salz
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Martin Gudgin
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Rich Salz
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Rich Salz
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Rich Salz
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Rich Salz
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Jacek Kopecky
RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Jacek Kopecky
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Rich Salz

Wednesday, 7 November 2001

Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Rich Salz
Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Martin Gudgin
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Rich Salz
RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) Williams, Stuart
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Martin Gudgin
RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) Doug Davis
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Martin Gudgin
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Rich Salz
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Rich Salz
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) Jacek Kopecky
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Rich Salz
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Rich Salz
proposed resolution for issue #18 - "top level" unclear Jacek Kopecky
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Dan Brickley
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Jacek Kopecky
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Dan Brickley
[soapbuilders] testing methodology for SOAP Encoding? (fwd) Dan Brickley
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Marc Hadley
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Dan Gunter
Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Marc Hadley
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Rich Salz
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Martin Gudgin
Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Hugo Haas

Tuesday, 6 November 2001

Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Rich Salz
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Martin Gudgin
RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) Doug Davis
RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) Williams, Stuart
RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) Williams, Stuart
RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) Doug Davis
RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) Williams, Stuart
RE: Issue 146 Doug Davis
updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Jacek Kopecky

Monday, 5 November 2001

RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Andrew Layman
Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Martin Gudgin
RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Andrew Layman
Proposal for hierarchical fault codes Martin Gudgin
RE: Issue 146 Williams, Stuart
Re: Issue 146 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Issue 146 Doug Davis
Issue -999 Dan Brickley
Re: FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-cunnings-salz-soap-auth-00.txt Rich Salz
Issue 146 Williams, Stuart
FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-cunnings-salz-soap-auth-00.txt Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 3 November 2001

ETF: Proposed Resolution to Issue #1 Asir S Vedamuthu

Friday, 2 November 2001

ANN: Language for Enabling Sites to be Inspected for the Presence of Web Services William A. Nagy
Re: Comments on issue 101 Hugo Haas

Thursday, 1 November 2001

RE: issue #144 proposal - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Andrew Layman
RE: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? Barbara Price
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Martin Gudgin
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Dan Brickley
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Christopher Ferris
RE: issue #144 proposal - array metadata in SOAP Encoding Jacek Kopecky
Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) Jacek Kopecky

Last message date: Friday, 30 November 2001 15:43:30 UTC