- From: duglin <duglin@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 22:54:18 -0400
- To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Didn't say MU's can appear on the body. The spec say: A body entry is semantically equivalent to a header entry intended for the default actor and with a SOAP mustUnderstand attribute with a value of "1". -Dug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com> To: "duglin" <duglin@yahoo.com> Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 10:52 PM Subject: Re: An analysis of mustUnderstand and related issues > > 1 - Because bodies are the same as headers targeted > > for the ultimate destination with an implicit > > MU flag on we need to make sure that when we > > check that all MU headers can be understood that > > we include the body in that list. > > Whoah. mustUnderstand can appear on the Body? I suppose that's > allowed because of the "body is just a header" escape hatch, but if so, > that is some serious reading between the lines. If so, then the spec > needs real clarification. > /r$ _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 22:53:11 UTC