- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:17:59 -0400
- To: "Kasi, Jay" <jay.kasi@commerceone.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
I'll just quickly second Doug's analysis. I think your conclusion #5 is not supported by the specification, and was not intended by my summary. I had written: >> Tagging elements in this manner >> assures that this change in >> semantics will not be silently >> (and, presumably, erroneously) >> ignored by those who may not >> fully understand it. I suppose it could be worded yet a bit more legalistically, but I referred to not silently ignoring "by those who my not fully understand it." I did not say "fail to be processed due to misrouting". Doug's summary is correct in my opinion, and SOAP only applies mustUnderstand rules at the point where an actor (explicit or anonymous) has been matched. In other words, MU is checked only at the points where software has reason to believe it should be responsible for handling a particular header block. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 21 May 2001 15:23:45 UTC