- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 08:30:25 -0400
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3c.org
But if: 0) Blocks are fundamentally unordered from a processing point of view. then the de-signing code will need to verify the correct order for processing anyway, right? -Dug Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>@zolera.com on 05/21/2001 08:25:46 AM Sent by: rsalz@zolera.com To: Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS cc: xml-dist-app@w3c.org Subject: Re: On the ordering of header entries > Just wondering, what's the rational behind not allowing someone > to reorder the headers? Not that I think people will be itching > to do it, I'm just curious. 8-) (Some subset of) the headers might be signed. I could imagine some intermediate actor "slurping up" the entire package, and then outputting the headers in arbitrary order (say, alphabetically by namespace URI). And they shouldn't do that. /r$
Received on Monday, 21 May 2001 08:30:36 UTC