- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 16:58:42 -0700
- To: Daniela Florescu <daniela.florescu@propel.com>
- Cc: "'Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com'" <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, marting@develop.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Just to clarify, it's not my point of view - I've heard it from a few people second-hand. I'm sympathetic to it as well, but haven't thought through the implications yet. Cheers, On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:35:47PM -0700, Daniela Florescu wrote: > > >> One of the comments that has come up re: SOAPAction > > >> and SOAP services in general is that making multiple > > >> methods/services available on the same URI (e.g., > > >> depositMoney, withdrawMoney on http://www.bank.com/service) > > >> is fundamentally at odds with the Web architecture, > > >> because all services/resources available on the Web > > >> (including Web Services) should be able to be identified by a > > >> (singular) URI. > > > > I am sympathetic in principle to this view, but doesn't it > > force us to: > > I am very sympathetic with Mark's point of view. Your concerns > are indeed valid, but there is a significant advantage if we do it > the way Mark suggested. > > Dana Florescu > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 4 May 2001 19:59:02 UTC