- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 17:16:17 -0400
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: marting@develop.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Just to be clear, although I am indeed intrigued regarding the possibility of encoding a SOAP request in a URI, probably in conjunction with an HTTP GET, it probably would be at best only sometimes be the right thing to do. In other words, an alternate HTTP binding, or maybe an option on the core binding. Also: I saw a discussion a few weeks ago among some URI experts who pointed out that long URI's are somewhere between discouraged and forbidden. I think that's really too bad based on the (0, 1, arbitray) view of limits, but there it is. Anyway, encoded in the obvious manner, SOAP requests are quite verbose. If anyone really wants to pursue this now, we should probably switch threads. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 4 May 2001 17:19:39 UTC