RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2001-05-04 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from May 2001)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 07:15:49 -0700
To: "'Painter, Philip'" <Philip.Painter@compaq.com>, "'Daniel Barclay'" <Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D03441724@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Given that the proposed clarification does not change the fundamentals
behind use of SOAPAction and says nothing about a 1:1 binding, does this
mean that you are in favor of the clarification?

Thanks!

Henrik

>We are currently using SOAPAction in what I thought was its 
>definition and will continue to do so since we currently have 
>no interop issues. However, for the future there will be 
>interop issues so this has to be resolved. We certainly don't 
>want to go with tying a service to a url 1-2-1.

Received on Friday, 4 May 2001 10:40:39 UTC