- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 07:21:07 -0400
- To: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
- Cc: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> In particular, I don't see anything that >prevents processing such a header after the body, and certainly nothing >that prevents processing it just because it is unreferenced. Did I miss >something?. I think its important to make a distinction between a new XMLP processor processing a header after the body is processed and a header being processed after the body within a single XMLP processor. I believe the 1st case is invalid because you're talking about a processor that comes after the ultimate destination - while the 2nd one is all processed within the ultimate destination. -Dug
Received on Friday, 4 May 2001 07:21:18 UTC