- From: Dick Brooks <dick@8760.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:58:06 -0600
- To: <frystyk@microsoft.com>, "XP-PUBLIC" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Henrik, I'll be sure to include this in the next (and hopefully final) round of edits. Thanks, Dick Brooks Group 8760 110 12th Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 dick@8760.com 205-250-8053 Fax: 205-250-8057 http://www.8760.com/ InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [mailto:frystyk@microsoft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 10:00 AM > To: Dick Brooks; XP-PUBLIC > Subject: RE: ebXML Messaging Service Specification available for 2nd > review > > > > Dick, > > Just a quick comment on the use of SOAPAction - it says in line 2339 > that > > The mandatory SOAPAction HTTP header field must also be included > in the HTTP header and must have a value of ebXML. > > SOAPAction: ebXML > > And it is mentioned again in line 2339 for the SMTP binding. For the > HTTP binding at least, the format of the SOAPAction field is a URI, as > per SOAP/1.1 [1] > > soapaction = "SOAPAction" ":" [ <"> URI-reference <"> ] > URI-reference = <as defined in RFC 2396 [4]> > > Including quotes so for compliance with SOAP I propose that this is the > format that ebXML uses as well. > > Hope this helps, > > Henrik > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383528 > > >The latest draft of ebXML's Message Service Specification, > >which utilizes SOAP V1.1 and SOAP with Attachments, is now > >available for review at: > >http://www.ebxml.org/specdrafts/ebXML_Message_Service_Specification_v0. > 98b.pdf
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2001 11:02:39 UTC