- From: <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:34:10 +0100
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (E-mail)" <frystyk@microsoft.com>, "Mark A. Jones (E-mail)" <jones@research.att.com>, "Krishna Sankar (E-mail)" <ksankar@cisco.com>, "Lynne Thompson (E-mail)" <Lynne.Thompson@unisys.com>, "Marc Hadley (E-mail)" <marc.hadley@uk.sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin (E-mail)" <marting@develop.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau (E-mail)" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Nick Smilonich (E-mail)" <nick.smilonich@unisys.com>, "Oisin Hurley (E-mail)" <ohurley@iona.com>, "Scott Isaacson (E-mail)" <SISAACSON@novell.com>, "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "Yves Lafon (E-mail)" <ylafon@w3.org>
Stuart,
This is looking good. I think the discussions you started on causality have
resulted in a better understanding of the one way issues.
In the revised document (section 3.2), [Correlation] appears as an argument
to the XMLP_Intermediary.receive primitive but not the
XMLP_Intermediary.forward one. I believe the intermediary should feed
forward the Correlation information to the ultimate recipient.
John
XML Technology and Messaging,
IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park,
Winchester, SO21 2JN
Tel: (work) +44 (0)1962 815188 (home) +44 (0)1722 781271
Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898
Notes Id: John Ibbotson/UK/IBM
email: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2001 05:53:15 UTC