Re: Finalised Glossary Definitions

Mark Nottingham wrote:

> > > We've tended to ignore the constructive side, but there must be
> > > some API for the sender which takes a relatively high-level
> > > characterization of the required behavior and manufactures the
> > > appropriate blocks.  This API should be modular so that
> > > independent blocks can be inserted and targeted independently,
> > > while still permitting any necessary dependencies (e.g.,
> > > ordering).
> >
> > I can see Henrik frowning his eyes... :)  But yes, seriously, there
> > will need to be an API
>
> There will certainly need to be an API somewhere (perhaps even
> standardized), but I hope this isn't meant to imply that this work is
> in scope for this group.

Oh, no, that's not what I meant!

Jean-Jacques.

Received on Thursday, 22 March 2001 11:39:07 UTC